Context, Character, and Civilisation: A Comprehensive Review of Mohammed and Mohammedanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58355/maqolat.v4i2.222Keywords:
Islamic Historiography, Prophet Muhammad, Qur’anic Literature, Orientalist Scholarship, Comparative Religion, Intellectual HistoryAbstract
This study offers a comprehensive analytical review of Mohammed and Mohammedanism, combining Reginald Bosworth Smith’s 1874 Royal Institution lectures and Emanuel Deutsch’s influential essay “Islam.” Through historical contextualisation, textual analysis, and comparative reflection, the review reassesses nineteenth-century European interpretations of the Prophet Muhammad (Pbuh), the Qur’an, and Islamic civilisation. The findings demonstrate that Smith and Deutsch pioneered a more balanced, evidence-based understanding that challenged prevailing polemical narratives. Their work highlights Muhammad’s (Pbuh) moral integrity, the Qur’an’s linguistic and literary uniqueness, and Islam’s substantial intellectual and civilisational contributions. This study situates their writings within broader Orientalist discourse while underscoring their lasting significance for modern scholarship on interreligious understanding, textual interpretation, and the historiography of Islam.
Downloads
References
Ackers, C. (1734). The Koran, Commonly Called the Alcoran of Mohammed. Retrieved from Internet Archive.
Ali, A. Y. (2004). The Qur’an: Text, translation & commentary. Islamic Book Trust.
(Original English translation published 1934)
Anjum, R., & Mir, K. H. (2024). Islam in The Modern World: Thinkers, Trends & Movements”, Edition 2nd, Education Publishing House, New Delhi, India.
Brown, J. A. C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The challenge and choices of interpreting the Prophet’s legacy. Oneworld Publications.
Çaksen, H., & Mir, K. H. (2025). George Sale’s Pioneering Translation: Unveiling ‘The Koran’ – A Critical Exploration of Early English Interpretations”. Al-Afkar, Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(1), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i1.1205.
Çaksen, H., & Mir, K. H. (2025). Unique Rational Explanations on Resurrection and the Hereafter from the Man of the Millennium, al-Afkar, Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(3), 1306–1313. http://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i3.1232.
Deutsch, E. (1869). Islam. The Quarterly Review, 127(254), 293–327.
Edelman, M., and Sandra, C. B. (2008). Creating Philanthropy Initiatives to Enhance Community Vitality, Staff General Research Report, no. 12951, Iowa State University, Department of Economics, https://ideas.repec.org/cgi-bin/htsearch?q=philanthropy, accessed 23 July 2025.
Esposito, J. L. (2011). What everyone needs to know about Islam (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The venture of Islam: Conscience and history in a world civilisation (Vols. 1–3). University of Chicago Press.
Ibn Hisham, A. (2009). The life of Muhammad: A translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (A. Guillaume, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work c. 8th century)
Ichwan, Moch, “Differing Responses to an Ahmadi Translation and Exegesis: The Holy Qur’an in Egypt and Indonesia”, Archipel, vol. 62, no. 1, 2001, pp. 143–61 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/arch.2001.3668].
Immanuel Oscar Menahem Deutsch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Oscar_Menahem_Deutsch August 8 2023.
Iqbal, J., “Democracy and the Modern Islamic State”, in Voices of Resurgent Islam, ed. by John L. Esposito, Oxford University Press, 1983.
IqbaI, H. (2008). Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Lattès, Jean-Claude. (1748). De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). Retrieved from Google Books.
Leaman, O. (2006). The Qur’an: An encyclopedia. Routledge. Literary Remains Emanuel Deutsch, https://archive.org/details/literaryremainso00deut.
Mir, K. H. & Anjum, M. R. (2025). The Role of Translation in the Development of Scientific Knowledge in the Premodern Islamic World. MAQOLAT: Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.58355/maqolat.v3i1.120.
Mir, K. H. (2020). Spirituality in Islam. In Essentials of Islamic Sciences, Adam Publishers & Distributors< New Delhi, India, 469–490.
Mir, K. H. (2026). Rethinking Islam: Dr. Fazlur Rahman’s Modernist Paradigm, (Unpublished).
Mohammed and Mohammedanism, https://archive.org/details/mohammedandmoha00unkngoog.
Neşriyat, E. (2007). İşaratü'l-İ'câz. Retrieved from Envar Neşriyat.
Rahman, F. (1980). Major themes of the Qur’an. University of Chicago Press.
Ross, E. D. (1909). The Koran. Translated into English from the Original Arabic with an Introduction by Sir Edward Denison Ross. London: Frederick Warne Publishers.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sale, G. (1734). The Koran, Commonly Called the Alcoran of Mohammed. London: C. Ackers for J. Wilcox. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/Sale1734Koran/page/n1/mode/2up [Retrieved 18 February 2024].
Smith, B. R. (1875). Mohammed and Mohammedanism: Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in February and March 1874. Smith, Elder & Co.
Smith, R. B. (2023). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Bosworth_Smith 16 December 2023.
Voltaire. (1748). De l'Alcoran et de Mahomet ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). Paris: Jean-Claude Lattès.
Watt, W. M. (1953). Muhammad: Prophet and statesman. Oxford University Press.
Waugh, E. H. (2019). The Muslim World: A Historical Survey (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Wilcox, J. (1734). The Koran, Commonly Called the Alcoran of Mohammed. Retrieved from Internet Archive.
Young, R. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture, and race. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khalid Hussain Mir, Prof. Hüseyin Çaksen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
